Littoral Combat Ship - An Examination of its Possible Concepts of Operation 

Analysis by Martin N. Murphy of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments

07:42 GMT, March 8, 2010 In 2008, the US Navy commissioned USS Freedom (LCS-1), the first of a new type of ship, the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), produced by Lockheed Martin. It anticipated commissioning a second, distinctly different LCS variant, to be named Independence (LCS-2), produced by General Dynamics, late in 2009. Despite initial issues with design, operational requirements, and especially cost growth, the Navy plans to order substantial numbers of one variant to help address the problem of declining surface ship force levels.

At the urging of then-Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Admiral Vern Clark, both types were designed without passing through the normal requirements process. Thus, by not keeping with previous practice, there was no formal a priori understanding of how these ships were intended to be used operationally, or what defined operational requirements they were intended to help meet.

Consequently, despite some conceptual work by various Navy organizations such as Third Fleet and Navy Warfare Development Command (NWDC), there is rather little understanding of what these ships may, or should, be able to do once they are out in the Fleet in numbers. While much of this no doubt will come from future operational testing, evaluation, and experimentation, it is useful to consider what potential concepts of operation may be possible and worth evaluating further.

The purpose of this paper is to take the platforms as designed and constructed, and attempt to answer the question: “How can they be used effectively?” This enquiry will offer some possible inputs concerning these four questions:

• What are the ships’ projected missions?
• Where and how could they be employed?
• What do the ships’ characteristics enable them to do that other ships cannot?
• What additional missions could they accomplish if certain modifications were made or capabilities added?

The full report (PDF, 84 pages) can be accessed directly at the following link: http://www.csbaonline.org/4Publications/PubLibrary/R.20100303.Littoral_Combat_Sh/R.20100303.Littoral_Combat_Sh.pdf)


----
This news item is part of the defpro.focus “US Navy Shipbuilding Programmes - FY10 and Beyond” which can be accessed here: http://www.defpro.com/focus/profile/us_navy_shipbui/. 
 

Avatar defpro.news


Country: Germany Type: Industry & Suppliers Status: premium
Company or Organisation Portrait:
The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy and resource allocation.

CSBA provides timely, impartial and insightful analyses to senior decision makers in the executive and legislative branches, as well as to the media and the broader national security community. CSBA encourages thoughtful participation in the development of national security strategy and policy, and in the allocation of scarce human and capital resources. CSBA’s analysis and outreach focus on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to US national security. Meeting these challenges will require transforming the national security establishment, and we are devoted to helping achieve this end.
 
Print